In a dramatic last-minute legal maneuver, New Jersey has filed for an injunction to stop New York City‘s congestion pricing plan, slated to take effect in Midtown and lower Manhattan on Sunday.
The state’s action introduces uncertainty into a project aimed at reducing traffic and funding public transit.
New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy’s administration submitted the legal motion following a federal judge’s partial remand of the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) approval of the tolling plan.
The remand, issued Monday by Federal Judge Leo Gordon, requires the FHWA to address why New York’s plan outlines pollution mitigation for the Bronx but omits similar measures for New Jersey communities likely to experience increased traffic and emissions.
Legal and Environmental ConcernsNew Jersey’s motion argues that the congestion pricing system must be delayed until federal regulators address the gaps highlighted by the court.
According to the filing, the Murphy administration contends that implementing the toll without resolving these concerns would irreparably harm New Jersey residents, who face worsening traffic and air quality.
They pointed to potential increases in vehicle traffic and pollution, particularly in towns near the George Washington Bridge and other major crossings.
A hearing on the motion is scheduled for Friday afternoon in Newark Federal Court.
MTA’s Position and Mitigation PromisesThe Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) has defended the congestion pricing plan, asserting that it will reduce overall traffic and promote the use of public transportation. While acknowledging potential localized impacts, including in New Jersey and parts of the Bronx, the MTA has pledged funds for mitigation efforts. These include establishing an asthma center in the Bronx and upgrading infrastructure at Hunts Point Market, a major distribution hub currently reliant on diesel technology.
However, New Jersey officials argue these plans remain vague and fail to address the state’s specific concerns. They have also pointed out that the remand casts doubt on the FHWA’s approval, making immediate implementation premature.
Federal Oversight and Next StepsJudge Gordon’s ruling earlier this week also directed the FHWA to clarify the environmental implications of phasing in toll rates and to provide a more thorough evaluation of alternative plans. The congestion pricing plan’s legal status now hinges on the federal court’s interpretation of the remand and New Jersey’s motion for an injunction.
The tolling system, if implemented, would charge drivers entering Manhattan’s central business district, with the goal of easing congestion and generating funds for public transit improvements. Proponents argue it is a necessary step toward sustainable urban mobility, while opponents, including the Murphy administration, fear it could disproportionately burden neighboring states and vulnerable communities.
As the clock ticks toward the planned Sunday launch, the outcome of Friday’s court hearing will determine whether congestion pricing moves forward or faces further delays.
